1.
GRAMMAR
Grammar
is the structural foundation of our ability to express ourselves. The more we
are aware of how it works, the more we can monitor the meaning and
effectiveness of the way we and others use language. It can help foster
precision, detect ambiguity, and exploit the richness of expression available
in English. And it can help everyone--not only teachers of English, but
teachers of anything, for all teaching is ultimately a matter of getting to
grips with meaning.(David Crystal,
"In Word and Deed," TES Teacher, April 30, 2004)
It
is necessary to know grammar, and it is better to write grammatically than not,
but it is well to remember that grammar is common speech formulated. Usage is the only
test.(William Somerset Maugham, The
Summing Up, 1938)
During the Middle Ages, grammar
was often used to describe learning in general, including the magical, occult
practices popularly associated with the scholars of the day. People in Scotland
pronounced grammar as "glam-our," and extended the association
to mean magical beauty or enchantment.
In the 19th century, the two
versions of the word went their separate ways, so that our study of English
grammar today may not be quite as glamorous as it used to be.
1. Strategies for Learning Grammar
Language
teachers and language learners are often frustrated by the disconnect between
knowing the rules of grammar and being able to apply those rules automatically
in listening, speaking, reading, and writing. This disconnect reflects a
separation between declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge.
·
Declarative knowledge is
knowledge about something. Declarative knowledge enables a student to
describe a rule of grammar and apply it in pattern practice drills.
·
Procedural knowledge is
knowledge of how to do something. Procedural knowledge enables a student to
apply a rule of grammar in communication.
For example, declarative knowledge is what you have when you read
and understand the instructions for programming the DVD player. Procedural
knowledge is what you demonstrate when you program the DVD player.
Procedural knowledge does not translate automatically into
declarative knowledge; many native speakers can use their language clearly and correctly
without being able to state the rules of its grammar. Likewise, declarative
knowledge does not translate automatically into procedural knowledge; students
may be able to state a grammar rule, but consistently fail to apply the rule
when speaking or writing.
To address the declarative knowledge/procedural knowledge dichotomy,
teachers and students can apply several strategies.
a. Relate knowledge needs to learning goals.
Identify the relationship of declarative knowledge and procedural
knowledge to student goals for learning the language. Students who plan to use
the language exclusively for reading journal articles need to focus more on the
declarative knowledge of grammar and discourse structures that will help them
understand those texts. Students who plan to live in-country need to focus more
on the procedural knowledge that will help them manage day to day oral and
written interactions.
b. Apply higher order thinking skills.
Recognize
that development of declarative knowledge can accelerate development of
procedural knowledge. Teaching students how the language works and giving them
opportunities to compare it with other languages they know allows them to draw
on critical thinking and analytical skills. These processes can support the
development of the innate understanding that characterizes procedural
knowledge.
c. Provide plentiful, appropriate language input.
Understand
that students develop both procedural and declarative knowledge on the basis of
the input they receive. This input includes both finely tuned input that
requires students to pay attention to the relationships among form, meaning,
and use for a specific grammar rule, and roughly tuned input that allows
students to encounter the grammar rule in a variety of contexts.
d. Use predicting skills.
Discourse
analyst Douglas Biber has demonstrated that different communication types can
be characterized by the clusters of linguistic features that are common to
those types. Verb tense and aspect, sentence length and structure, and larger
discourse patterns all may contribute to the distinctive profile of a given
communication type. For example, a history textbook and a newspaper article in
English both use past tense verbs almost exclusively. However, the newspaper
article will use short sentences and a discourse pattern that alternates
between subjects or perspectives. The history textbook will use complex
sentences and will follow a timeline in its discourse structure. Awareness of
these features allows students to anticipate the forms and structures they will
encounter in a given communication task.
e. Limit expectations for drills.
·
Mechanical drills in which
students substitute pronouns for nouns or alternate the person, number, or
tense of verbs can help students memorize irregular forms and challenging
structures. However, students do not develop the ability to use grammar
correctly in oral and written interactions by doing mechanical drills, because
these drills separate form from meaning and use. The content of the prompt and
the response is set in advance; the student only has to supply the correct
grammatical form, and can do that without really needing to understand or
communicate anything. The main lesson that students learn from doing these
drills is: Grammar is boring.
·
Communicative drills
encourage students to connect form, meaning, and use because multiple correct
responses are possible. In communicative drills, students respond to a prompt
using the grammar point under consideration, but providing their own content.
For example, to practice questions and answers in the past tense in English,
teacher and students can ask and answer questions about activities the previous
evening. The drill is communicative because none of the content is set in
advance:
Teacher :
Did you go to the library last night?
Student : No, I didn’t. I went to the movies. (to Student 2): Did you read
chapter 3?
Student 2 : Yes, I read chapter 3, but I didn’t understand it. (to Student 3):
Did you understand chapter 3?
Student 3 :
I didn’t read chapter 3. I went to the movies with Student 1.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar